Reply. The L-sized version of the disruptor, Cloud Lightning, is only available from researching debris from defeating void clouds; I think I end up getting. Otherwise disruptors and autocannons. Small. The biggest distinction on what is meta is when warfare becomes reasonably possible. • 9 mo. Kinetic weapons (Gauss Cannons) are good against. Stellaris. limonbattery • 5 mo. Stellaris fleet getting destroyed. I usually using few battleships with different specify weapons like Rocket hangars and artillery. Artillery battleships are still good, but instead of megacannon/neutron torpedo like the old days you want tachyon lance/kinetic artillery. 权重：75. 0 unless otherwise noted. Business, Economics, and Finance. Stellaris 2. Technology in Stellaris is divided into 3 research areas with each area corresponding with one of the research resources: Engineering, Physics and Society. 200% efficiency against armor and shield while dodging all heavy. Winning battles across the stars is about adapting to the enemy's loadout and. Use plasma cruisers or plasma battleships. Disruptors buffed, energy weapon of short range high damage fast attack. Stellaris Fun Facts or Multiplayer VideosI make Stellaris Guide Videos filled with Memes(Used to be)Inspired by Nurse and TrupenMy Twitter: The weapons all appear to tend towards major penetration of a defensive layer, like shields or armor. Incredible finds out the truth about StellarisFinding out the truth about Ship Designs In Stellaris. The disruptors are not. Make a species with Engineering, natural intelligence and sedentary, use the mechanist origin. Vote. Disruptor Corvettes are particularly noteworthy as they will beat any other Corvette or Destroyer design, making them uncounterable in the early-game. To expand on this, disrupters have lower DPS than kinetics or energy weapons, to compensate for the fact that they bypass shields and armor. 1, currently 3 weapon types, (Phaser, Disruptor, Plasma) 2. ) are good against armor but bad against shields. Jump to latest Follow Reply. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. 对该项目的细节说明请添加至相关页面. Can someone help me figure out when to use each of these? Disruptors at least are a little different in that they decimate shields, so I'm assuming it's a good idea to have some if you're rocking energy weapons. I'm not playing x25 late game crisis strength anymore. 6? I'd go with this 1. In this video I show how disrupters are highly effective against smaller ships even when used by larger ships such as Cruis. This seems more like the regular disruptor however it also sounds like it needs new physics to explain. 3 Penetrating 2. To expand on this, disrupters have lower DPS than kinetics or energy weapons, to compensate for the fact that they bypass shields and armor. high evasion). So, let’s take this opportunity to explore how the cloaking technology in Stellaris: First Contact works. The main weapons are Strike Craft + Missiles (not Torpedoes) + Arc Emitters + Disruptors + Cloud Lightning. Instead, the techs that you can research are randomly selected from the available techs (from the official Stellaris wiki):. Yes they are good, especially since they can go on battleship m slots, they are also useful for flak destroyers. It improves the graphics of almost EVERY weapon in the game- adding lots of new custom effects (while staying true to vannilla intentions), improved ship spacing and behavior in battles, adds new EPIC. Arc emitter + Cloud lightning/disruptor battleships are the best counters for both of the above. Alpha strike is often decisive in Stellaris fleet actions, and giving it up hurts. I may be talking complete nonsense here, but I think plasma + disruptor is the best way to go. Against something like. Both! Kinetic weapons have a bonus against Shields and malus against Armor, while Laser ones have the opposite. Missile corvette spam is really strong. It's a good idea to have some PD mixed in too. By all means if the system is a strong chokepoint or has a good planet, the interests of your empire trump all, blast away. More information can be found in Stellaris Dev Diary #293. However, there is one exception: defense platforms cannot. Bcs they are op. And to. Depends on how much HP the target has to deal with as compared to armour and shield. 31. Soon there will be nothing left of the poor titan bar dust and debris and the sated swarm will. a Tier 3 technology cannot be "drawn" until the country owns at least six Tier 2 technologies. 9. 6 composition, I advice : Frontliner ship : Disruptor or PD Corvette or Torpedo brawler Cruiser (torpedo computer) Flak PD ship : PD Destroyer or Torpedo Assault Carrier. It's not worth considering Disruptors. . Here's my copy-paste on my thoughts on the new meta and the most dominant ship designs: Focused Arc Emitter / Carrier / Marauder / Whirlwind Battleships by far the best "all-rounder" ship. I dont think the bad is bad. You can win the game if you beeline for top disruptors and ignore everything else. Especially if you're aiming for kill rate you'll need very specialized fleet. Every time a ship is hit by an attack when at low hull it has a chance to disengage, and a low damage weapon like the Disruptor gives them so many chances to disengage that you won't kill anything. Technology. 2. Last time I played there was discussion between torpedo corvetes and lance battleships and everybody agreed that mixed. Deus Vult brothers. 3, and yes I know it's quite long. The upside is that you don't waste research time on any weapon. The best fleet composition in Stellaris is one that has the following criteria: is simple to set up, is cheap, and overperforms at its current power level. 9] This mod aims to increase the individuality of empires while maintaining the highest possible level of compatibility with other mods and without changing how weapons work. These can evicerate high-evasion vessels like corvettes, but are less effective against high-HP units. The BIGGEST Stellaris CRISIS Battle EVER In MultiplayerThis is by far the BIGGEST Stellaris Crisis Battle that I have EVER Experienced in MultiplayerMy Patre. It’s not going to include the best fleet designs, though I think we might be able to make some inferences. which remains a valid alternative to 2 medium Phased Disruptors due to low alloy cost, low power usage, slightly better range, and the fact that battleships can't have pure M. Disruptors work best when you go all-in on them so that you can completely ignore enemy shields and armor. This is a problem that most modifiers have in Stellaris; instead of each one multiplying the output of the previous one, they all get added together and then applied to the base value. Torpedo assault carrier is the most balanced ship design. Also destroyers are bad. 例如：“异种保护区”（建筑）的特殊说明请在. Mono-cruiser fleets are totally viable. Do not bring destroyers or corvettes into the battle as the scourge will decimate them. The counter to disruptors are weapons. Disruptors are spectacular when paired with cloud lightning or arc emitters and in large numbers, however by itself it is terrible. 2. While inferior to battleships they can be deployed faster and are sturdy enough to survive a firefight. Kusto_ • 5 mo. However these are mostly techno-babble terms than anything realistic and realism has never been a thing Stellaris has (or should) concerned itself with, so just make them look like energy beams that give off light. But yes, if you wanted to lean heavily into one form of protection or the other then 2-3x hardeners would be a necessity vs bypass weapons. Stellaris Fun Facts or Multiplayer VideosI make Stellaris Guide Videos filled with Memes(Used to be)Inspired by Nurse and TrupenMy Twitter: place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. With regards to disruptors: They're very good in the early game, since everything has little relative HP and fights are mostly at point blank anyways. A fleet will initiate FTL travel when any ship in. ago. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. Maybe someone can explain to me why the Plasma Thrower line of techs have the same tech costs as the Disruptors line and the Autocannons line. the 100% shield & armor ignore is tempting. 2 Shields is overkill. The meta is dominated by Torpedoes, Carriers, and Artillery. They disengage, but often won't destroy the ship. You equip the same as with any others. E. Exarch_Alpha. Gray Tempest has evenly balanced defenses, but their hull isn't paper-thin like the Contingency's; your best bet is a mix of energy-kinetic. Hi guys, Can you explain what is the problem with disruptors? Also, what other weapons - aside from missiles - is buggy at the moment? your input will be greatly appreciated- @GloatingSwine also, @Lex Peregrinei think i will try fleets of disruptor corvettes and cruisers in my next game. The Voidspawn is an unborn guardian, hidden within a size 20 Dry world orbiting a class G star. I doubt though the the original intent of the developer was to potentially end 40% of the games before the end game crisis or a FE awakening. Use the torpedo computer, and fill up free slots with missiles. znihilist. 8. ”. Phase disruptor are not. This is a writeup on the best ship designs in Stellaris v 3. At 40 repetitions you have increased the damage by 200%. Tier 0 is used for starting technologies. The obvious answers: larger fleets, with better tech, and more of them. They have the DPS of 20 disruptor corvettes and the HP of 15 but cost only 8 in fleet cap and 10 in alloys. disruptors generally dont belong on larger slots, if you want to have a strike at shields at longer range, arty or the torpedo option would probably be better. Autocannon corvettes will wreck the missile corvettes or even just disruptor corvettes. You get 15% pop output and quick&efficient pop modding, while getting all the bonuses of being cyborg. modifier. A disruptor fleet will chew through almost anything. 38 Badges. Stellaris has three damage types; energy, kinetic and explosive with a grand total of about 25 weapons excluding tiers. Missiles and disruptors have been buffed in 3. Shields can be stacked higher than armour. FTL drives are improved with advancing technology, eventually unlocking drives which can "jump", moving from one system to another in an instant. Finally, some of the more exotic weaponry have some weird weights to them. Carrier ai can increase that and thus can increase engagement range. ago. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. Legacy Wikis. I'd say they're slightly weaker or equal to vanilla Leviathans, You can try whittling them down gradually with waves of cheap ships like torpedo/disruptor corvettes. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. ago. and or hardeners. FE/AE and the Contingency are the best examples for this. Advanced shields require Strategic Resource to make. Neutron launchers normally trump disruptors under 'even' conditions thanks to range for first strike, the assumption that the enemy isn't going to be thwacking you even harder than you can hit them, and their low tracking generally. These shred shields but to little damage to armor. disruptors are near worthless against anything that's hull makes up more than 1/3 of it's total health. The unbidden lack any armor and hulls and rely purely in shields which kinetic weaponry is designed to overcome, and while we can argue firepower wise stellaris late game tech is stronger than Mass Effect. The reason I ask this is that the tooltip suggests that disruptor bypass both shields and armour completely (100% penetration), this is further suggested because there are weapons with shield and armour damage, not penetration. 1:1,1 The disruptor won on 1:1,2 ratio. Signature Weapons [3. But yea, I don't consider disruptors a weapon, their stats make much better point defense even in a medium slot. - "Only" 50% AP, No Bonus vs. 1 Overview 2 Energy weapons 2. there are new ascension traditions, get an exclusive surfshark deal! enter promo code montu for an extra 3 months free at surfshark. The Fire Rate changes have made small weapons the strongest they've been since before the last rework, with "Brawler" weapons in particular tending to grow stronger the smaller they are. 7 and considering the buff on armor and shield, I’d consider it buffed by. Each ship class has two hull upgrade techs in engineering, so it isn't static. and you can do a full "broadside" cruiser build with 6 M slots, so you can outfit them with full M disruptors. Disruptor-Corvette: Strengths: Hard wins against every small ship in the game (Destroyer and below) Weaknesses: Hard loses to everything else Techs needed: Disruptors (optional: better thrusters, after burner) Required Components: best Thruster, Swarm Computer Sections: Interceptor S-slots: 3 DisruptorsA place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. It very much depends. Stellaris. Medium disruptor has range 60 and average damage 6. This mode. 4 carriers, 22 artillery battleships and a titan is a solid fleet composition for late game. Simplicity is good in this context. Computer system. 1) Cruisers are "poor man battleships" and should be avoided. Cheaper Alloys cost than armor. Stellaris. Use plasma if they themselves use armor since it penetrates a ton of it. 2. . Alle Diskussionen Screenshots Artworks Übertragungen Videos Workshop Neuigkeiten Guides Rezensionen. kinetic are outgunned my kinetic artillery. Autocannons are good on corvettes. Massive Range to both and Arc also ignore both armor and Shield and can deal absurd amounts of damage. ) You want plasma cannons [at highest level] or neutron launchers [I'd prefer this one] instead of disruptors, and you probably want Artillery sections for your battleship rather than that Broadside section in the core. It's just not worth polluting your tech tree with the repeatable techs it unlocks and more Defense Platform hull points are kinda irrelevant. Imo, yes. The Fire Rate changes have made small weapons the strongest they've been since before the last rework, with "Brawler" weapons in particular tending to grow stronger the smaller they are. If your shields and armor can take it, good. Check the hull to armor/shield ratio on the enemies. I have two swarms of 200 corvettes with around 60k fleet power each. problem is aside. It was a long-awaited change since the meta seemed to be amassing Battleships with Neutron Launcers and going through the game mindlessly. I usually use Arc Emitters + CLC + Disruptors (ie all energy), but if you have bonuses or better tech in kinetic or missiles that's fine, just pick the weapons that will bypass as much of their shields and armor as possible. This means that, on things where you can stack a bunch of bonuses, the marginal positive or negative modifier doesn't do as much as it implies. . With how high armour/shield values are vs HP, disruptors and Arc Emitters just delete anything, including all regular enemies, fallen empires and all crisis. You might win some battles but your losses will probably be worse than theirs. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewThis page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:47. 1. naturally need too reduce the 100% penetrations too something more reasonable but this way its great against. Arc emitters and cloud lightning. nightgerbil • 5 yr. ago. Lets make a tier list! Lets dive in!Get your own Montu Merchandise: List Pla. They also have the theoretical longest range, since they can fly across an entire system, but they do suffer from travel time. So what's your opinion on the ascension rework in 3. Neutron launchers front load, making for far superior weapons for L slots. This is part of what's making Corvette vs Corvette fights into just Disruptor spam, because there's no good anti-armor weapon on Corvettes so your only real option is just to ignore the armor. With regards to disruptors: They're very good in the early game, since everything has little relative HP and fights are mostly at point blank anyways. Therefore, these 'vettes should be easily replacable and cheap. You'll want to build larger ships (as they benefit more from armor) and fill them with armor. (scouge, contingency)But, like with most topics having to do with actual rocket science, this cloaking tech can be complicated. . And cloud lightning, and arc emitters. They disengage, but often won't destroy the ship. On the long-range side there's also Neutron Launchers, Kinetic Artillery, Strike Craft, and Tachyon Lance. The best anti-Corvette weapons are Hangars (ignores shields), Autocannons (gets massive damage bonus against shields), and Disruptors (ignores shields), so shielding is nearly useless. Your disruptor is also shorter range. I'd suggest Hanger Modules (maximum trade protection + counters small ships) and a Communications DIsruptor (slows ships which buys you a little extra time to get a fleet over). Cloud lightning is an L-size weapon with range 70 and average damage 11. Cooperative PvE can be initiated from the main menu - all players that hotjoin the hosted game will join the primary player’s empire. Early rush: Disruptor They’re massively buffed, raw damage by a factor of 1. It lacks the bonus to hull damage lasers have. Oct 12, 2022. The higher tier energy weapons have much greater range than the plasma weapons do, higher dps, and at least for the s/m/l slots the lasers have higher tracking and accuracy. Disruptors. First Game on 3. I know I'm late to the partyDiscord: used:Lucky Channel no ThemeBlaZeon - Emergency Avoidance (SMW Custom Music)Pokémon Bla. AI empires are more likely to use disruptors in 3. You can win the game if you beeline for top disruptors and ignore everything else. 9 Meta Update] We are all aware that Stellaris ship design has had a massive rebalance, and with that the combat system and the overall pace of the game. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. 4 Lance 2. - "Only" 50% AP, No Bonus vs. Medium. Physics is the primary technology path you will be going down if you want to maximize your battle capabilities. They'll never leave their system or disengage. When first discovered, a fleet of disruptor corvettes can take on significantly larger fleets of conventional corvettes and cause devastating losses while taking very few themselves. Not enough. 13. Stellaris Ship Design Guide 2023 [3. A properly kitted equals size fleet (Kinetic artilley to start combat, and something like plasma for closer ranges), will output 4-5x more damage with all the extra modifiers. Medium disruptor has range 60 and average damage 6. For those unaware, Shield Hardening is a new ship stat that is given by a new module, Shield Hardener, which give a percentage for shields to apply to weapons that would otherwise bypass shields, like Missiles and Torpedoes. Losttruppen Colonel. I want to return to playing stellaris after long break and I'm wondering what is current best fleet. 1 Laser 2. Enjoy the game! Immerse yourself in the exploration of a changing universe full of wonders! Check out this mod and modify your Stellaris experience. Otherwise you are mixing the bad traits of both, rather than exploiting the good of either. The Humans discovered this, and ended up fighting the Flood, which they lost really bad and started to go on the run. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:48. That being said, their granddaddies the Focused Arc Emitter (X-size weapon) is an insanely good and strong weapon. Shields can be stacked higher than armour with. Next video will be an actual shitpost, more like my first one. Nov 9, 2018 97 0. 8. ago. However, in order to win this way you will need a solid economy of your own and enough military power to. Disruptors in game are described as “Disruptors fire energy bolts that damage and destroy the molecular bonds holding the target's constituent atoms together. 3. ). The user interaction aspect utilizes a card shuffle approach rather than a traditional tech tree. Community Hub. Therefore, these 'vettes should be easily replacable and cheap. Increase the maximum range of weapons by 100% or so. Third option seems flawless as unbidden don’t use point defence. ago. And to a lesser extent the cloud lightning weapon. . Disruptors and Defense platforms are both terrible for the same reason: disengagement. You have Focused Arc Emitter for a big damage weapon against large ships, Strike Craft clean up smaller ships easily, while Marauders and Whirlwind missiles. - After researching cloaking, most science ships belonging to AI near Fallen Empires with closed borders become permanently trapped in emergency FTL as they keep trying and failing to path. Disruptors: tech_disruptors_1: Doctrine: Armada Battle Formation: tech_doctrine_fleet_size_5: Doctrine: Fleet Liasions:. 64 DPS. You won't use them. 4. Since I like the mechanics and feeling like a Star Trek villain, I use disruptor fleets. In this video I show how disrupters are highly effective against smaller ships even when used by larger ships such as Cruis. The upside is that you don't waste research time on any weapon. You may have to deal with rampaging marauders, border skirmishes, genocidal empires, economy problems, and many other things. Can fit into Small and Medium slots. If you need to invade, Cruisers are the best early benchmark, although Destroyers *can* work if you mix PD destroyers to L/M destroyers, have. Energy Weapons (Lasers, Neutron Launchers etc. Energy weapons also have a "special" kinds of weapons (Disruptors and Arc Emitters) that ignore both shields and armor, all damage goes directly to the hull but the overall damage can be pretty low. For your bit about plasma throwers and point defence, yeah P slot weapons are way overtuned. Otherwise you are mixing the bad traits of both, rather than exploiting the good of either. As a brand-new player, unless I'm wrong, I hear you should just spam disruptors? On your ships from what I hear from vet players, disruptors are just the defacto best weapon to use? If I build a navy should I just spam the ever living hell out of them? Makes sense to just use the best in such a hard game. The idea really is to give dedicated players just that little bit more, good for role-playing and for building up those stories sci-fi fans love so much. The more raw HP there is to take down, the less it's worth. Nathan Kraats. CryptoStellaris 50512 Bug Reports 31005 Suggestions 19176 Tech Support 2909 Multiplayer 377 User Mods 4633 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports) Console edition 1219. kinetic are outgunned my kinetic artillery. Early on your two guaranteed habitables can be used for 1 energy 1 mineral, or alloys if you want to go to war early. ) You want plasma cannons [at highest level] or neutron launchers [I'd prefer this one] instead of disruptors, and you probably want Artillery sections for your battleship rather than that Broadside section in the core. Just slap those bois everywhere till you get battleships, then rush for arc emitters and kill void clouds to get cloud lightning. I'm not sure about the difference between ignore shield and shield penetration but for the shield damage, disruptors get a double damage bonus when firing at shielded ships. Looking forward to test the fleet builds again, and check if the AI issues are fixed. (If you are all missles then create two ships that are point defense only. Disruptors have 30 range while Missiles have 100 range. Stellaris: The Missile Meta - In this video I explore how powerful the missile meta is in the new 3. Any non-penetrating weapon on a disruptor fleet is probably worthless. Using dark matter tech on your disruptor corvettes is horribly, horribly uneconomical. Kumqwatwhat • 5 yr. 1 - They are just weapons in your ships and starbases. Missiles are also horrifically countered by PDS~~/Strike Craft~~, so anything heavy on missiles is a self-solving problem. Strike craft are a godsend against corvette swarms. Gun battery - kinetic weapon, bonus. It does, however, show Ion Disruptors as a completed tech. There is a Synopsis with the conclusions at the end of the post. For direct-fire guns to go alongside missiles, I favor disruptors, yeah. Toggle signature. Stellaris is a game with a lot of details to it, and can take a while to understand. I like to use Kinetic for the initial long range engagement (Shields are still up) and Laser for smaller, shorter range weapons meant to finish the job by mostly damaging the remaining Armor and Hull. . Weapons that would normally bypass the shields/armor entirely are forced to deal 25% of their damage to the component they are trying to pierce, it's a counter to penetrating weapons. General Damage is best done bye Gauss Cannons. With the exception of Autocannons, Kinetic and Missile weapons no longer have bonus hull damage. If the enemy is using PD you might have problems but they usually go regular weapons. It depends heavily on how the Corvettes were armed. In both cases you want maximum afterburners to close the distance in the first case or kyte in the latter. For just shield piercing, strike craft and missiles which are a lot more prevalent in AI fleets. DeanTheDull Necrophage • 2 yr. lasers are outgunned by plasmas. The trick is that you need to commit to either all disruptors, or no disruptors. Corvettes are why missile spam is good right now. Stellaris will throw a lot of curveballs at you while you play. If wars of conquest are possible within the first 20-30 years, the best way to gain pops and planets to start snowballing is to conquer them from. Depends on who you're fighting. May 21, 2017 @ 5:44am Yes but those take time and need engineering then physics. phase distruptors suck big time. Torpedoes dominate the early-game (where Carriers don't exist yet so their only counter is crappy Pickets), Carriers dominate the mid-game (since their techs are so cheap so you can max them out early), and Artillery dominate the late-game (because they're ridiculously powerful once. Battleships with arc-emitters shielded and by torpedo corvettes make short work of the fallen empires who thought they could invade my borders. Blocked pops with the Psionic trait to also receive the Latent Psionic trait. 2. 2) Battleships with Arc Emitters and Cloud lightings are insanely powerful (especially with AI mod - because with it AI will able to get own repeatables too and since it pen weapons will start to win over "normal" one). Disruptors and Autocannons are now considered Brawling weapons, with short range but faster attacks. Energy Weapons (Lasers, Neutron Launchers etc. Unsure. Stellaris. Sure. Coupled with the Guardian of the Galaxy (or whatever it's called) ascension perk means they just tear hulls apart without touching shields or armour. I think you need about 0. Also, the Plasma and Autocannon weapons (and Disruptors. 例如：“异种保护区”（建筑）的特殊说明请在. Stellaris: Disruptor Devastation. Its almost like two options are interchangeable. As a devouring swarm, I only ever build up to a maximum of 12 soldiers and set them to aggressive and they automatically land on the planet when the system is taken if they have a good chance at winning. Disruptors have high tracking to ignore evasion and completely ignore armor and shields, making them one of the best anti-Corvette weapons in the game. removed the warp drives and cores until i can decide what to do with them, added a M slot variant of torpedoes. Hmm I guess I was thinking of energy siphons cause your right disruptors just ignore shields and armor, I just looked on the Stellaris wiki. Missiles penetrate shields, so there's a viable argument for shield hardeners to some extent. - Lowest Range. Even then your money seems to be better used on something that completely penetrates either armor or shields, or better yet, destroys them completely, so your autocannons and plasma cannons can finish the job. 1; Reactions:. Refire rate and general stats have been adjusted. But it also penetrates armor by 50%. 7 Badges. Especially if you're aiming for kill rate you'll need very specialized fleet. ) are good against armor but bad against shields. Science fiction novels that might be interesting to Stellaris players. 25. This gives you an opportunity to counter their defenses and kill them faster than they can kill you. 4. Absolute top choice, especially for Megacorps but also Driven Assimilators. So for mid game,. Disruptor Strike Craft - 3 levels unlocked with the appropriate disruptor technology and strike craft technology; Null Void Strike Craft - 1 level unlocked with null void and strike craft 3. #stellaris #deusvult #crusadesStellaris Tech Tree. It has few rewards but grants a unique ship at the end of the event chain. Cloud Lightning is only good if you're using Arc Emitters as well. No. Or Energy Torpedos. Refire rate and general stats have been adjusted. Cooperative PvE can be initiated from the main menu - all players that hotjoin the hosted game will join the primary player’s empire. one has better tracking and is better against strike craft while the other is better vs missiles but they'll both work for either. I know stellaris ship design is a lot of countering enemy ships, but in general, is having a fleet that mainly targets hull a…Stellaris. Meanwhile, try to expand outwards and look for suitable new colonies. Rule Zero of Stellaris combat: autodesigned ships suck so much they have an event horizon. Torpedos mostly, for the big wallop against big ships, supplemented with Scourge Missiles for their greater speed. 2) Focused arc emitter/carrier/medium disruptor battleship (with afterburners) 3) Disruptor menacing corvettes (with afterburners, requires Become the Crisis). Hardening negates the biggest advantage of strike craft, missiles, and disruptors, and higher regen will offset the lower initial HP total if a fight gets dragged out or you get caught by a. One reliable method to determine what tier a research item belongs to is to go to the Stellaris Engineering Research Wiki page and look it up.